Caloric density and weight loss – Starch Solution first week results

I finished week 1 on Starch Solution and am pleased to report a 7.5 lb weight loss – with no feelings of hunger between meals. On to week 2! Of course I am realistic and don’t expect this rate of loss every week. I realize that the first week on any diet is usually the best.

Some people were asking what I have been eating. I’m not really much of a cook, so I’m eating simple. For example, baked potatoes, sweet potatoes, microwave packages of brown rice, frozen mixed veggies (corn, peas, carrots), salads (cucumber, tomatoes), some legumes mixed in the salad (50 g packages of garbanzo beans or red kidney beans), sometimes non-starchy frozen mixed vegetables, a bit of soy milk to moisten the potatoes, sometimes some salsa on the potatoes. Yesterday I needed to be out during lunch so I got some soba noodles and edamame at the nearby 7/11. Things like that that.

It’s practically what can be called a “comfort food” diet in that sense. You definitely don’t feel deprived. Not only that, it’s incredibly inexpensive eating this way.

What I also wanted to talk about is an interesting article and chart about “calorie densities” here –

I’m used to calorie counts, of course, but the new information for me was:

  1. Apparently there is a lot of research which has shown that on a day-to-day basis, people generally eat a similar amount of food, by weight (rather than by volume – which surprised me). Therefore, choosing foods with a lower calorie density allows us to consume our usual amount of food (or more) while reducing our caloric intake.
  2. On the calorie density scale (calories/lb), fruits and vegetables are the lowest (60-195) , followed by the starches, which I’ve been eating a lot of, including potatoes, yams and rice (320-630) and legumes (310-780). Pasta fits in here as well, but I haven’t eaten any yet, unless you count the soba I had yesterday. Breads are higher up on the scale (920-1,360) because they are less dense (more air, less water), so this is one reason why it’s easy to eat too many calories of those. Even higher up are things which are mostly air, such as popcorn (1,480-1,760). One serving of air-popped popcorn is not a huge number of calories. But it’s also not very filling, which is why you keep going back for more. Nuts and seeds are way higher up (2,400-3,200). Oils and other pure fats are at the top (4,000). The chart was for vegans, but I checked other sources and see that for seafood, lean poultry and lean red meat the calorie densities are higher than potatoes, rice, sweet potatoes and corn, but in generally the same range as legumes (400-870).

You can see the chart on the link above.

As the article says, it appears that people can eat freely of foods that are 300 calories per pound or less and not gain weight. People can consume relatively large portions of foods that are between 300 and 800 calories per pound and still lose or maintain their weight, depending on their individual activity levels and metabolism.

This probably accounts for why I was able to lose so much this first week.

Anyway, this starch-centric vegan approach has really been a revelation to me. It’s really a diet combination/approach I had not tried before, and seems to fill in some missing pieces for me in the ways I’ve always thought about calories, satiety, hunger control and weight loss. If you aren’t vegan, I think you can still fit in an approach which is conscious of caloric density. But this approach seems easiest for me.


Caloric density and weight loss – Starch Solution first week results — 4 Comments

  1. Good job! I wish I could lose 7 lbs in a week! You give me great motivation!

  2. Just started my first week on the Starch Solution (Friday 7th Oct 2016) I am amazed that my sweet cravings disappeared as soon as I started eating comfort foods like potatoes, bread, beans Etc. I hope I get your 1st week’s loss. I was on the Atkins/Paleo for 2 years lost about 18lbs after 3 months but then stalled and craved carbs. This and the constipation made we try the Startch Solution. It has amazed me how your mind can be swayed entirely to do either if you read enough. It seems to me that long term if you never mix high fat with high carb you can eat well and still stay trim. Looks like the food combining principles of Slimming World have it spot on.

  3. This is really interesting. It seems with dieting you have to pick your enemy. You can make protein your enemy and eat high carb. Or carbs your enemy and eat high fat. Or calories your enemy and eat everything in small quantities. I’m pretty sure that any of these approaches work well if you stick to them religiously. It’s a question of working out which you are more likely to be able to stick to. I am also not convinced that you can eat a ton of carbs or fat and still lose weight. So portion control has to factor in at some point. Which for me is a challenge with carbs….I might try the Starch solution anyway. but olive oil 😫

  4. I’m having ups and downs, rebounds and losses, etc. this past year. Most of what you say is correct. I’m back eating vegan non-oil now, and I have lost like 13 pounds over the last 10 weeks or so.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.