<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary and the band</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lerner.net/blog/2008/02/16/hillary-and-the-band/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lerner.net/blog/2008/02/16/hillary-and-the-band/</link>
	<description>Doug Lerners reports from Tokyo and St. Louis, and points beyond...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 04:41:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://lerner.net/blog/2008/02/16/hillary-and-the-band/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 05:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lerner.net/blog/2008/02/16/hillary-and-the-band/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>I think you have hit the nail on the head. 

Add to the media darling phenomenon that Obama has become basically a shell into which people can fill anything they want. That&#039;s why you see Republicans saying they might vote for him even though he is the most liberal Senator on record - with a higher liberal rating than Teddy Kennedy. It&#039;s because he is (cleverly) being exceptionally vague in the campaign, so people see in him whatever they want.

doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have hit the nail on the head. </p>
<p>Add to the media darling phenomenon that Obama has become basically a shell into which people can fill anything they want. That&#8217;s why you see Republicans saying they might vote for him even though he is the most liberal Senator on record &#8211; with a higher liberal rating than Teddy Kennedy. It&#8217;s because he is (cleverly) being exceptionally vague in the campaign, so people see in him whatever they want.</p>
<p>doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randombob</title>
		<link>http://lerner.net/blog/2008/02/16/hillary-and-the-band/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>randombob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 05:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lerner.net/blog/2008/02/16/hillary-and-the-band/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Question:  How much do you think Obama&#039;s momentum is due to the fact that he&#039;s the &quot;Media&#039;s Darling&quot;?

I mean, the only time they mention him is either a) as an underdog, which in America is a BIG thing, or B) just generally in good light, or c) both.

Clinton on the other hand, always seems to be slighted, as if &quot;it&#039;s hers to lose&quot; or other.  Seems that while they&#039;re not blatantly bashing her, they seem to only allude to her as &quot;that&quot; candidate, rather than A candidate....  At least what I see.  

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.randombob.net/files/hilaryforpresident2008.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; random bob, a.r.c.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question:  How much do you think Obama&#8217;s momentum is due to the fact that he&#8217;s the &#8220;Media&#8217;s Darling&#8221;?</p>
<p>I mean, the only time they mention him is either a) as an underdog, which in America is a BIG thing, or B) just generally in good light, or c) both.</p>
<p>Clinton on the other hand, always seems to be slighted, as if &#8220;it&#8217;s hers to lose&#8221; or other.  Seems that while they&#8217;re not blatantly bashing her, they seem to only allude to her as &#8220;that&#8221; candidate, rather than A candidate&#8230;.  At least what I see.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.randombob.net/files/hilaryforpresident2008.html" rel="nofollow"> random bob, a.r.c.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
